| 2008 CFC Application Revision |
 |
|
|
 |
| 2008 CFC Application Revision |
|
A 16 person TAG Team (Technical Assistance Group) and eight OHCS employees are working on a Consolidated Funding Cycle (CFC) application to be used starting with the Fall 2008 funding round. The group's first meeting is scheduled for February 21, 2007. As the application develops, the most current draft will be available for viewing at this web site location.
|
|
|
| TAG Team Agenda's and Handouts |
|
February 21, 2007 Meeting
 February 21, 2007 Meeting Agenda
CFC Application Revision Committee Timeline
Fall 2008 CFC Application Revision Objectives
March 15, 2007 Meeting
March 15, 2007 Meeting Agenda
Proposed CFC Application Revision and Process
CFC Proposed Revision and TAG Suggestions from 02/21/07 Meeting
April 19, 2007 Meeting
April 19, 2007 Meeting Agenda
May 17, 2007 Meeting
May 17, 2007 Meeting Agenda
Requirements To Be Met In The 75 Day Packet
TAG Team Cost Worksheet
June 14, 2007
June 14, 2007 Meeting Agenda
July 19, 2007
July 19, 2007 Meeting Agenda
Possible Population Types
2007–2008 OHCS Housing Research Plan
August 16, 2007
August 16, 2007 Meeting Agenda
 CFC Redesign Full Survey Results
 Draft County Median Incomes
Draft County Rent Burden Rates
September 20, 2007
September 20, 2007 Meeting Agenda
Special Needs Population Research – Draft County Information
Current Application vs. Proposed Application
Draft Self-Scoring Section
Materials To Be Submitted
October 12, 2007
October 12, 2007 Meeting Agenda
Special Needs Populations
Draft Rent Burden Ratios with State and County Values
Draft Location of Work and Home – Census 2000
December 17, 2007
December 17, 2007 Meeting Agenda
Draft Self-Scoring Section
Draft CFC Special Needs and Affordable Housing Needs Assessment
Draft Special Needs Groups_County Detail
Draft Workforce and Special Needs Rank
Draft Workforce Index: Rent Burden Ratios with State and County Values
|
|
|
| TAG Team Meeting Minutes |
|
February 21, 2007 Meeting
February 21, 2007 Meeting Minutes
March 15, 2007 Meeting
March 15, 2007 Meeting Minutes
April 19, 2007 Meeting
April 19, 2007 Meeting Minutes
May 17, 2007 Meeting
May 17, 2007 Meeting Minutes
June 14, 2007
June 14, 2007 Meeting Minutes
July 19, 2007
July 19, 2007 Meeting Minutes
August 16, 2007
August 16, 2007 Meeting Minutes
September 20, 2007
September 20, 2007 Meeting Minutes
October 12, 2007
October 12, 2007 Meeting Minutes
|
|
|
| Needs Analysis |
|
The purpose of this Affordable and Special Needs Housing Assessment is to identify gaps in the provision of Special Needs and Affordable Housing statewide using special need population numbers and unit counts from a Statewide Affordable Housing Inventory. Based on the needs results, each need group has been assigned a Priority 1, 2 or 3 rank within each county according to the percent of each population that has housing available. The revised CFC application will assign points to each project based on the stated priority rank.
Priority 1 populations are defined as 1) being designated by OHCS as a top priority need for all regions of the state, 2) being a special need group whose housing needs have been addressed in the community at a rate significantly lower than the those of other groups. 3) renter households (earning 30-60% median income) that are rent burdened (spending more than 30% of their income on housing) at rates higher than the state value, or 4) other OHCS benchmarks TBD.
Priority 2 populations are defined as 1) a special need group whose housing needs have been addressed in the community at a rate above those of the Priority 1 need groups within that county. 2) renter household (earning 30-60% median income) that are rent burdened (spending more than 30% of their income on housing) at index rates 0.88-1.00 which translates into slightly below the state rate of rent burden.
Priority 3 populations are defined as 1) a special need group whose housing needs have been addressed in the community at rates significantly higher than those of Priority 1 need groups and at rates that are also higher than Priority 2 population groups. 2) renter households (earning 30-60% median income) that are rent burdened (spending more than 30% of their income on housing) at index rates below 0.88 which translates into lower than the state rate of rent burden.
These are the most current Draft needs analysis documents (see Methods for detailed information about the process used in the creation of this information):
CFC Needs Analysis
Priority Rank by County
Statewide Housing Inventory
Special Needs Detail by County
Workforce Detail
Methods
|
|
|
|
